Comparative Evaluation of the Results of Treatment of Acute Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction in Children

dc.contributor.author	E.E. Kobilov
dc.contributor.author	M. K. Tukhtaev
dc.date.accessioned	2026-01-02T11:32:31Z
dc.date.issued	2022-12-03
dc.description.abstract	100 endo-surgical and 100 traditional surgery methods were performed, and it was established that a comparative analysis of laparoscopic and traditional methods of treatment showed that endoscopic adhesion has a significant advantage over traditional laparotomy.
dc.format	application/pdf
dc.identifier.uri	https://geniusjournals.org/index.php/emrp/article/view/2760
dc.identifier.uri	https://asianeducationindex.com/handle/123456789/77424
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.publisher	Genius Journals
dc.relation	https://geniusjournals.org/index.php/emrp/article/view/2760/2363
dc.source	Eurasian Medical Research Periodical; Vol. 15 (2022): EMRP; 1-3
dc.source	2795-7624
dc.subject	nonsurgical
dc.subject	laparoscopic
dc.subject	adhesion
dc.subject	adhesions
dc.title	Comparative Evaluation of the Results of Treatment of Acute Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction in Children
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type	Peer-reviewed Article

item.page.files

pagination.showing.labelpagination.showing.detail

item.page.filesection.name: kobilov_2022_comparative_evaluation_of_the_results_of.pdf
item.page.filesection.size: 163.25 KB
item.page.filesection.format: Adobe Portable Document Format