WITNESS PROTECTION MEASURES AND THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: A COMMON LAW APPROACH

dc.contributor.authorMamatalieva Shakhnoza Khushmamat kizi
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-09T20:49:20Z
dc.date.issued2026-02-09
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the admissibility of evidence obtained in criminal proceedings where special measures are used to ensure witness protection in Common Law jurisdictions. It focuses on the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, and argues that admissibility must be assessed through a principled evaluation of overall fairness rather than formal procedural compliance alone.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://ecomindspress.com/index.php/ger/article/view/287
dc.identifier.urihttps://asianeducationindex.com/handle/123456789/114654
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherEcominds Press
dc.relationhttps://ecomindspress.com/index.php/ger/article/view/287/297
dc.sourceGlobal Economic Review: Journal of Economics, Policy, and Business Development; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): GER; 25-30
dc.source2980-5287
dc.subjectWitness protection; admissibility of evidence; criminal proceedings; fair trial; confrontation rights; protected witnesses; common law; evidentiary safeguards; Article 6 ECHR; cross-examination.
dc.titleWITNESS PROTECTION MEASURES AND THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: A COMMON LAW APPROACH
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typePeer-reviewed Article

item.page.files

item.page.filesection.original.bundle

pagination.showing.labelpagination.showing.detail
loading.default
thumbnail.default.alt
item.page.filesection.name
kizi_2026_witness_protection_measures_and_the_admi.pdf
item.page.filesection.size
420.77 KB
item.page.filesection.format
Adobe Portable Document Format

item.page.collections