THE PRINCIPLE OF AVOIDING CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN CASE OF DAMAGE BY TAX AUTHORITIES: THEORETICAL-LEGAL AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

dc.contributor.authorN. А. Abdurakhimov
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-27T20:32:03Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-27
dc.description.abstractThis article analyzes the theoretical and legal foundations, practical mechanisms, and international experience of the principle of avoiding conflicts of interest in compensating for damage caused by tax authorities. The article compares the concept of fiduciary obligations, theories of state responsibility, and the experience of Germany and France with the legislation of Uzbekistan.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://usajournals.org/index.php/4/article/view/1876
dc.identifier.urihttps://asianeducationindex.com/handle/123456789/112712
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherModern American Journals
dc.relationhttps://usajournals.org/index.php/4/article/view/1876/1963
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.sourceModern American Journal of Business, Economics, and Entrepreneurship; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026); 172-174
dc.subjectTax authorities, conflict of interest, state responsibility, fiduciary duties, damages, judicial independence, anti-corruption expertise.
dc.titleTHE PRINCIPLE OF AVOIDING CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN CASE OF DAMAGE BY TAX AUTHORITIES: THEORETICAL-LEGAL AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typePeer-reviewed Article

item.page.files

item.page.filesection.original.bundle

pagination.showing.labelpagination.showing.detail
loading.default
thumbnail.default.alt
item.page.filesection.name
abdurakhimov_2026_the_principle_of_avoiding_conflict_of_in.pdf
item.page.filesection.size
432.04 KB
item.page.filesection.format
Adobe Portable Document Format

item.page.collections