AUDIT PROCEDURE: NEW PROCEDURE FOR REVIEWING SENTENCES IN UZBEKISTAN

dc.contributor.authorLawyer Z.S. Nazarov
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-29T18:48:19Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-30
dc.description.abstractIn the science of criminal procedural law, the review of court decisions is perceived as a form of criminal procedural activity. It includes several types of review of court sentences and determinations, both those that have entered into legal force and those that have not. The functions of the appellate and cassation instances of the court consist precisely in the fact that at each of the specified stages, the legality of the sentence and determination of the court that considered the case in the previous instance is verified.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://webofjournals.com/index.php/9/article/view/2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://asianeducationindex.com/handle/123456789/26153
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWeb of Journals Publishing
dc.relationhttps://webofjournals.com/index.php/9/article/view/2011/1996
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.sourceWeb of Humanities: Journal of Social Science and Humanitarian Research; Vol. 2 No. 10 (2024): WOH; 105-109
dc.source2938-3803
dc.subjectreview of court decisions, sentence, file an appeal, judicial errors, revision in the revision procedure, change of the sentence, complaints and protests in the revision procedure.
dc.titleAUDIT PROCEDURE: NEW PROCEDURE FOR REVIEWING SENTENCES IN UZBEKISTAN
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typePeer-reviewed Article

item.page.files

item.page.filesection.original.bundle

pagination.showing.labelpagination.showing.detail
loading.default
thumbnail.default.alt
item.page.filesection.name
nazarov_2024_audit_procedure_new_procedure_for_review.pdf
item.page.filesection.size
181.83 KB
item.page.filesection.format
Adobe Portable Document Format

item.page.collections