Among military personnel Evaluation of systemic hemodynamic parameters during unilateral spinal anesthesia combined with epidural analgesia

dc.contributor.authorRakhmankulov E.J. Ph.D
dc.contributor.authorAssociate Professor Mirrakhimova S.Sh Ph.D
dc.contributor.authorProfessor Avakov V.E
dc.contributor.authorChakganov O'.A
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-02T11:34:02Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-22
dc.description.abstractEvidence for the superior quality of spinal anesthesia compared with epidural anesthesia is provided by studies that show a significantly lower increase in blood cortisol levels during abdominal surgery with spinal anesthesia [31, 66; pp. 42-64] and that epidural analgesia provides sufficient blockade of the hormonal response to operative stress only when supplemented with spinal anesthesia [66; pp. 42-64]. There are objective conditions for the occurrence of such problems, which are determined by the anatomical features of the epidural space. In the case of repeated epidural blocks in one patient, adhesions in the epidural space formed after the first procedure may serve as a factor impeding the spread of anesthetic, which indicates a higher incidence of anesthetic failure in patients with a “history of epidural anesthesia”. [14; p. 19-23, 32; 33-42, 80; 299-301- b].
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://geniusjournals.org/index.php/emrp/article/view/6622
dc.identifier.urihttps://asianeducationindex.com/handle/123456789/77861
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherGenius Journals
dc.relationhttps://geniusjournals.org/index.php/emrp/article/view/6622/5498
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.sourceEurasian Medical Research Periodical; Vol. 40 (2025): EMRP; 16-17
dc.source2795-7624
dc.subjectsensory
dc.subjectepidural analgesia
dc.subjectunilateral spinal anesthesia
dc.titleAmong military personnel Evaluation of systemic hemodynamic parameters during unilateral spinal anesthesia combined with epidural analgesia
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typePeer-reviewed Article

item.page.files

item.page.filesection.original.bundle

pagination.showing.labelpagination.showing.detail
loading.default
thumbnail.default.alt
item.page.filesection.name
phd_2025_among_military_personnel_evaluation_of_s.pdf
item.page.filesection.size
219.84 KB
item.page.filesection.format
Adobe Portable Document Format

item.page.collections