ANALYTICAL REVIEW ON INNOVATIONS IN UZBEKISTAN’S CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LEGISLATION BY 2025 AND COMPARISON WITH AZERBAIJAN

dc.contributor.authorScientific Supervisor: Soliyev Dilshod Bakhtiyor ug‘li
dc.contributor.authorStudent: Alisherov Komronbek Bakhromovich
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-28T11:15:26Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-21
dc.description.abstractThis analytical review maps the key modernization trends in Uzbekistan’s criminal procedure legislation up to 2025 and benchmarks them against comparable developments in Azerbaijan. On the Uzbekistan side, the study systematizes recent amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code adopted in 2024–2025 and related reforms, with particular attention to the shift toward technology-enabled procedure and stronger procedural safeguards, including the legal recognition and regulated handling of digital evidence. The analysis then compares these trajectories with Azerbaijan’s ongoing procedural and administrative digitalization, including reforms that expand legally valid electronic submission of information through e-government channels and policy moves toward “electronic pre-trial proceedings,” digital documentation of investigative actions, and broader use of electronic evidence.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://usajournals.org/index.php/3/article/view/1668
dc.identifier.urihttps://asianeducationindex.com/handle/123456789/4594
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherModern American Journals
dc.relationhttps://usajournals.org/index.php/3/article/view/1668/1746
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.sourceModern American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities; Vol. 1 No. 9 (2025); 91-106
dc.source3067-8153
dc.subjectCriminal procedure reform; Uzbekistan Criminal Procedure Code; Azerbaijan Criminal Procedure Code; 2024–2025 amendments; digital evidence; electronic pre-trial proceedings; e-justice; judicial control; fair trial guarantees; defence rights; admissibility and integrity of evidence; procedural safeguards; comparative legal analysis; digitalization of investigations; due process vs efficiency.
dc.titleANALYTICAL REVIEW ON INNOVATIONS IN UZBEKISTAN’S CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LEGISLATION BY 2025 AND COMPARISON WITH AZERBAIJAN
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typePeer-reviewed Article

item.page.files

item.page.filesection.original.bundle

pagination.showing.labelpagination.showing.detail
loading.default
thumbnail.default.alt
item.page.filesection.name
ugli_2025_analytical_review_on_innovations_in_uzbe.pdf
item.page.filesection.size
377.91 KB
item.page.filesection.format
Adobe Portable Document Format

item.page.collections