ADVANTAGES IN COMPARING ENDOSCOPIC AND CONVENTIONAL SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS IN THE BILIARY TRACT

dc.contributor.authorTeshabaeva M.A.
dc.contributor.authorMusashaykhov H.T.
dc.contributor.authorZhuraev G. G.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-29T17:56:18Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-15
dc.description.abstractTraditional laparotomy choledocholithotomy, despite the possibility of performing any intervention on the extrahepatic bile ducts, in 1937.7% of cases is accompanied by the development of complications both in the early and late postoperative periods and is generally more difficult for patients than any other interventions [38.77]. Mortality after open interventions on extrahepatic bile ducts, according to a number of authors, reaches 7.8%. This circumstance makes laparotomy choledocholithotomy a less preferred method of treating patients with cholelithiasis complicated by choledocholithiasis, stenosing duodenal papillitis and their combination, limits its use and encourages the search for new ways to solve the problem.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://webofjournals.com/index.php/5/article/view/1147
dc.identifier.urihttps://asianeducationindex.com/handle/123456789/23960
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWeb of Journals Publishing
dc.relationhttps://webofjournals.com/index.php/5/article/view/1147/1116
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.sourceWeb of Medicine: Journal of Medicine, Practice and Nursing ; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): WOM; 82-87
dc.source2938-3765
dc.subjectcholecystectomy, endoscopic papillosphincterotomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic transpapillary interventions.
dc.titleADVANTAGES IN COMPARING ENDOSCOPIC AND CONVENTIONAL SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS IN THE BILIARY TRACT
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typePeer-reviewed Article

item.page.files

item.page.filesection.original.bundle

pagination.showing.labelpagination.showing.detail
loading.default
thumbnail.default.alt
item.page.filesection.name
ma_2024_advantages_in_comparing_endoscopic_and_c.pdf
item.page.filesection.size
262.99 KB
item.page.filesection.format
Adobe Portable Document Format

item.page.collections