Divergence of Views in Terms of the Concept Anger: Universality and Culture Specifitty

dc.contributor.authorUbaydullayeva Dilafruz Fazliddinovna
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-01T11:31:36Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-13
dc.description.abstractIn this study I'll point out that the English word ‘anger’ and its synonymous constituents in Uzbek and English languages are maintained on generalities of anger that have to deal with a lot of complexity. This abstract complexity comes out from several coffers (1) the conceits and metonymies that apply to the concepts in various languages (2) the prototypes of anger that people partake in these societies, and (3) the numerous different senses that the word anger and its counterparts have in different languages. We can ask Are there any universal aspects of the conception(s) of anger?
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://zienjournals.com/index.php/jpip/article/view/3910
dc.identifier.urihttps://asianeducationindex.com/handle/123456789/62144
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherZien Journals
dc.relationhttps://zienjournals.com/index.php/jpip/article/view/3910/3238
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.sourceJournal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices; Vol. 20 (2023): JPIP; 29-31
dc.source2770-2367
dc.subjectDifferent languages
dc.titleDivergence of Views in Terms of the Concept Anger: Universality and Culture Specifitty
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typePeer-reviewed Article

item.page.files

item.page.filesection.original.bundle

pagination.showing.labelpagination.showing.detail
loading.default
thumbnail.default.alt
item.page.filesection.name
fazliddinovna_2023_divergence_of_views_in_terms_of_the_conc.pdf
item.page.filesection.size
191.91 KB
item.page.filesection.format
Adobe Portable Document Format

item.page.collections