Terrorism: A Dysfunctional Quagmire Over the Concept

dc.contributor.authorAkame Nnoko Remi Joel
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-01T12:35:41Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-15
dc.description.abstractOne of the most contentious questions in international politics is the question of the definition of terrorism. Perhaps one of the better-known aphorisms is that “one man’s terrorist is another man’s liberation fighter.”1 It is not accidental that this aphorism emerged within the context of the liberation struggles in Southern Africa in which the settlers/colonial oppressors described freedom fighters as terrorists and created the impression that the liberation armies were rebels without a just cause. A definition seems controversial for reasons other than conceptual issues and problems. Because labelling actions as terrorism promotes condemnation of the actors, a definition may reflect ideological or political bias
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://zienjournals.com/index.php/zjssh/article/view/201
dc.identifier.urihttps://asianeducationindex.com/handle/123456789/63842
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherZien Journals
dc.relationhttps://zienjournals.com/index.php/zjssh/article/view/201/157
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.sourceZien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities; Vol. 2 (2021): ZJSSH; 44-52
dc.source2769-996X
dc.subjectcondemnation
dc.subjectcontentious
dc.subjectinternational
dc.subjectoppressors
dc.titleTerrorism: A Dysfunctional Quagmire Over the Concept
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typePeer-reviewed Article

item.page.files

item.page.filesection.original.bundle

pagination.showing.labelpagination.showing.detail
loading.default
thumbnail.default.alt
item.page.filesection.name
joel_2021_terrorism_a_dysfunctional_quagmire_over.pdf
item.page.filesection.size
306.37 KB
item.page.filesection.format
Adobe Portable Document Format

item.page.collections